Waste Management and Recycling
1.
Hazardous Waste
Generation
Definition:
This indicator
shows the generation of regulated hazardous waste. A
“hazardous waste” is one of a large number of substances
that are regulated because they may pose a risk of adverse
effects on human health and the environment. They typically
are produced through manufacturing, mining, or other
industrial or commercial activities. In order to protect
public health and the environment, federal and state laws
place strict controls on the treatment, storage, and
disposal of these wastes.
Significance:
Hazardous waste generation can result in significant
pollution of the land, air, and water, as well as
significant adverse health effects for humans and wildlife.
Both the amounts of hazardous waste generated and the number
of hazardous waste generating facilities, provide insight
into the potential for environmental contamination that may
have adverse effects on a state’s human health and the
environment.
Historical/Trend Analysis,
Generation of Regulated Hazardous Waste

Data reflect South Carolina (SC) total, United States (US) average,
and Southeast (SE) average. The southeast region consists
of Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North
Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee.
Source:
National Biennal RCRA Hazardous Waste Reports
Selected State Rankings, Tons
of Hazardous Waste Generated, 2005,
(“1” represents state with
the highest quantity of hazardous waste generated, as
measured in tons)
|
SC |
NC |
GA |
TN |
TX |
SD |
|
25 |
17 |
15 |
12 |
1 |
50 |
|
177,734 |
384,112 |
480,269 |
776,095 |
15,224,158 |
992 |
2.
Number of Hazardous
Waste (“Superfund”) Sites[1]
Definition:
The Superfund Program, or the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, Liability Act of 1980, was created
as a program to identify and prioritize the clean up of
dangerous hazardous waste sites.
Sites identified are placed on the National Priorities List. Sites may
be eligible to be cleaned up using federal money located in
a dedicated trust fund or the Superfund. Many of these
sites are abandoned, or their ownership is unclear. Use of
the Superfund allows the government to begin cleanup of the
sites as expeditiously as possible, while the government
seeks to determine who is responsible for the continuation
at the site.
Significance:
The number of Superfund sites contained in a state provides
a measure of the potential exposure of humans, wildlife, and
the natural environment to hazardous substances.
Historical/Trend Analysis,
Number of Superfund Sites

Data reflect South Carolina (SC) total, United States (US) average,
and Southeast (SE) average. The southeast region consists
of Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North
Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee.
Source:
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Active Super
Fund Sites
Selected State Rankings,
Number of Superfund Sites, 2006
(“1” represents state with
the highest number of superfund sites)
|
SC |
NC |
GA |
TN |
NJ |
ND |
|
26 |
12 |
22 |
30 |
1 |
50 |
|
16 Sites |
31 Sites |
16 Sites |
13 Sites |
113 Sites |
0 Sites |
3.
TOXIC CHEMICAL RELEASES
Definition: This indicator shows the
amounts of releases of toxic chemicals for which federal law
requires reporting. Data is found in the Toxics Release
Inventory (TRI), which was established by Congress in the
Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA)[2]
and the Pollution Prevention Act of 1990.[3]
As of August 2005, the TRI consists of a list of 666
chemicals and chemical categories. EPA adds and deletes
chemicals to the TRI reporting requirements on an annual
basis.
Significance:
The
Emergency Planning and
Community Right-to-Know Act mandates the disclosure of the
uses and releases of a list of toxic chemicals. The TRI is
designed to make information regarding the use and release
of these chemicals available to regulators, industries, the
general public, and other interested parties. One of its
main effects has been significant reductions by industries
in the amounts of toxic chemicals released to the
environment. The Environmental Protection Agency cautions,
however, that “users of TRI data should be aware that TRI
data reflect disposal or other releases and other waste
management activities for chemicals, not whether (or to what
degree) the public has been exposed to them. Both the
toxicity of a chemical and exposure should be taken into
account when using the data.”[4]
Historical/Trend Analysis,
Toxic Chemical Releases

Data reflect South Carolina (SC) total, United States (US) average,
and Southeast (SE) average. The southeast region consists
of Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North
Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee.
Source:
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Toxic Release
Inventory
Selected State Rankings,
Toxic Chemicals Released in 100,000 pounds, 2006
(“1” represents state with
the highest total
on-site and off-site disposal and other releases in pounds)
|
SC |
NC |
GA |
TN |
AK |
RI |
|
20 |
8 |
11 |
10 |
1 |
50 |
|
753.29 |
1,340.95 |
1,297.63 |
1,314.18 |
6,676.22 |
4.99 |
In 2006, the EPA issued
the TRI Burden Reduction Rule, which took effect in the
reporting of calendar year 2006 data. Prior to calendar
year 2006, facilities that released or managed under 500
pounds of a not-persistent, bioaccumulative, toxic
chemical, (PBT) could use a shorter form (Form-A) to
report information about TRI-chemical usage. Form-A
contains information about facility location, chemical
use, and the parent company. Facilities releasing more
than 500 pounds of non-PBT TRI-chemicals had to report
more detailed information in Form-R. Form-R contains
information about total chemical releases and disposal,
while Form-A does not. The Rule raises the Form-A
reporting threshold to 2,000 pounds on non-PBT chemical
release or management. Thus, it is possible that a
slight decrease in TRI chemical releases could be the
result of the rule change and not a real reduction.[5][6]
4. MUNICIPAL Solid Waste Generation & MANAGEMENT
Definition:
This indicator shows the amount of non-hazardous municipal
solid waste generated. Municipal solid waste (MSW) typically
consists of items such as yard trimmings; food scraps;
paper; wood; rubber, leather, and textiles; plastics;
metals; and glass. In many instances there are significant
opportunities to conduct reduction and/or recycling of these
wastes.
Significance:
One of the key indicators of progress in reducing solid waste generation
is the amount of MSW generated per person per day. This
database will show generic recycling rates and pounds of
trash generated per person per day for the U.S. and SC.
Historical/Trend Analysis, Municipal
Solid Waste Generated and Disposed

Data reflects South Carolina (SC) and United States (US) totals.
Sources: SC Solid Waste
Management Annual Report, FY 2003, SC Department of Health
and Environmental Control; and Municipal Solid Waste in the
United States 2003: Facts and Figures,
United States Environmental
Protection Agency

Data reflects South Carolina (SC) and United States (US) totals.
Source: SC Solid Waste
Management Annual Reports, 2001-2005, SC Department of
Health and Environmental Control; and Municipal Solid
Waste in the United States 2005: Facts and Figures, United
States Environmental Protection Agency
Note: The EPA excludes
combustion (such as mass burns) and composting in its
final disposal statistics. In South Carolina,
combustion and composting are included in disposal
statistics. In order to obtain a valid comparison, we
included composting and combustion in national
statistics.
5. RECYCLING
Definition: This indicator shows the
overall rate of recycling of a variety of commonly used
materials. According to the U.S. EPA, “recycling” is “a
series of activities that includes collecting recyclable
materials that would otherwise be considered waste, sorting
and processing recyclables into raw materials such as
fibers, and manufacturing raw materials into new products.”[7]
Some of the materials included in these recycling rates are
auto batteries, steel cans, yard trimmings, paper and
paperboard, aluminum, tires, glass, corrugated cardboard,
newsprint, and plastics, scrap metals, wood products, yard
debris, and other materials.
Significance:
Increases in a state’s recycling rate can mean several
things. First, they can indicate a diversion of materials
from municipal solid waste landfills and incinerators. This
diversion saves precious landfill resources and can lead to
the reuse of the recyclable materials. Second, these
increases can translate into economic benefits for the
region in which they occur. These benefits include reduced
costs for manufacturing new products through utilization of
recyclables and reduced impacts to natural resources (i.e.,
reduced depletion of natural resources such as forests and
minerals obtained through land mining.
Historical/Trend Analysis,
Municipal Solid Waste Recycling Rates

Data reflects South Carolina (SC) and United States (US) totals.
Source : SC Solid Waste
Management Annual Reports, 2001-2005, SC Department of
Health and Environmental Control, and Municipal Solid Waste
in the United States 2005: Facts and Figures, United States
Environmental Protection Agency.
Note: The EPA includes composting its recycling rates. In South
Carolina, composting is included in disposal
statistics. In order to obtain a valid comparison, we
included composting in national recycling rates.
6. LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE
WASTE
Definition:
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recognizes
five general categories of radioactive waste: (1) high-level
waste, which is spent nuclear fuel from nuclear reactors and
high-level waste from the reprocessing of spent nuclear
fuel; (2) transuranic waste,[8]
mainly from defense programs; (3) uranium mill tailings from
the mining and milling of uranium ore; (4) low-level
radioactive waste[9],
and (5) naturally occurring and accelerator-produced
radioactive materials.[10]
Radioactive waste is placed in one of these categories based
on its origin, not on the extent of its radioactivity.
Thus, it is possible that some “low-level” waste may have
the same level of radioactivity as some high-level waste.”[11]
There currently are just three low-level radioactive waste
disposal sites licensed in the United States. Two of the
low-level radioactive waste disposal facilities are operated
by EnergySolutions, and are located in Barnwell, SC and
Clive, UT; a third facility, operated by U.S. Ecology, is
located in Richland, WA.[12]
A curie (Ci) is “the basic
unit used to describe the intensity of radioactivity in a
sample of material. The curie is equal to 37 billion
disintegrations per second, which is approximately the
activity of 1 gram of radium. A curie is also a quantity of
any radionuclide that decays at a rate of 37 billion
disintegrations per second. It is named for Marie and Pierre
Curie, who discovered radium in 1898.”[13]
Humans are continually exposed to radiation from natural and
man-made sources. For example, the body produces
approximately 10.53 nCi a year, and a chest x-ray produces
approximately 2.7 nCi.[14]
The measure, nCi refers to a nanocurie, or one billionth of
one curie.
Significance:
The U.S. Department of Energy reports low level waste
transport in curies. The indicator below reports the
radioactivity of the annual transport of low-level waste to
the three active disposal sites. It is important to note
that the indicator does not show human exposure to the
radioactive waste. It does represent a risk to future
public exposure, either from an accident in transportation
or an accidental release from the disposal site.

The data reflects the total
radioactivity of annual waste shipments to Clive, UT,
Richland, WA, and Barnwell, SC.
Source:
United States Department of Energy, Manifest Information
Management System.
7.
Spent Nuclear Fuel
Definition:
Spent
nuclear fuel (SNF) consists of highly radioactive elements
(mainly uranium and plutonium) remaining after used fuel
rods are removed from commercial nuclear reactors (those
reactors used to generate electricity). SNF also is a
by-product of the Department of Energy’s nuclear weapons
program. SNF remains highly radioactive, and thus highly
toxic and dangerous, for many thousands of years.
Significance:
Because nuclear
fuel remains extremely hazardous for thousands of years; it
therefore must be stored carefully to avoid exposure to
humans or the environment. The federal government was
required to take title to spent nuclear fuel at commercial
reactors, and begin moving this fuel to a central storage or
disposal facility, commencing on 31 January 1998; however,
lack of a single storage facility has delayed this action.
Because of this fact, spent nuclear fuel remains in storage
at the reactors in which it was used. This storage
typically is accomplished either by immersing the spent fuel
rod assemblies in a pool of water (“spent fuel pools”), or
by placing the assemblies in a radiation-proof cask
(“dry-cask storage”). The United States Department of Energy
is in the process of preparing to operate a permanent,
long-term storage facility for spent nuclear fuel and other
nuclear waste at Yucca Mountain, Nevada.
The Energy Information
Administration does not currently publish information
related to the amount of spent nuclear fuel derived from
commercial electricity generation. However, information is
available on the web site of the Office of Civilian
Radioactive Waste Management. Because data for commercial
SNF is restricted, we have decided to post SNF data that has
been generated by the Department of Energy’s nuclear weapons
production program. This SNF is in storage at a number of
sites scattered across the country, including the Savannah
River Site in Aiken, SC.

Source:
U.S. Department of Energy, National Spent Nuclear Fuel
Program
*MTHM means Metric Tons Heavy
Material.
Rev.: 03.14.08
[1] “Hazardous waste sites” refers
to sites listed on the National Priorities List
pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA or
“Superfund”), as amended. See 42 U.S.C.§§9601 to
9675 (2000).
ii 42 U.S.C. §§11001 to
11050 (2000).
[3] 42 U.S.C. §§ 13101 to 13109
(2000).
[5] United States Government
Accountability Office. (2007, October)
Environmental Right to Know: EPA’s Recent Rule
Could Reduce Availability of Toxic Chemical
Information Used to Assess Environmental Justice.
(Pub. No. GAO-08-115T). Retrieved from:
http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d08115t.pdf
[6] “Toxic Release Inventory
Burden Reduction, Final Rule.” Federal Register
40:372 (December 22, 2006) P. 76932
[8]
A transuranic element is one that has an atomic
number of 93 or more – that is, it has a greater
number of protons in its nucleus than does uranium.
“All of them are radioactive.”
Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
[9] Low-level radioactive waste
is “radioactively contaminated industrial or
research waste such as paper, rags, plastic bags,
water-treatment residues. It is waste that does not
meet the criteria for (the) other categories of
radioactive waste; spent nuclear fuel and high-level
radioactive waste; transuranic radioactive waste; or
uranium mill tailings. Its categorization does not
depend on the level of radioactivity it contains.”
U.S. EPA Radiation Information, “Radiation
Glossary J-M”
[14] Nebel, Bernard J. and Wright,
Richard T. Environmental Science: 7th
Ed. Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ.
2000.
|