| VOL.2, NO.4 - NOVEMBER 2003
ISSN: 1540 - 1499 |
| |
| Observations |
| By Robert W. Oldendick |
Over
the past several months, Governor Sanford’s Commission
on Management, Accountability and Performance (MAP
Commission) has devoted considerable effort to examining
how state government works. The extensive
recommendations provided in the Commission’s report
would, if adopted, have a significant impact on how
state government operates, and the merits of these
various proposals have already received considerable
media attention.
Some
of the issues considered by the Commission are also the
topic of two of the articles in this issue of Public
Policy & Practice. In his article, “Good to
Great: Some Lessons for State Government,” Ed Thomas
examines some fundamental concepts related to operating
state government in South Carolina. He argues that,
despite the problems identified by the MAP Commission,
government in South Carolina is good, but not great. He
also discusses a number of factors, including leadership
development, organizational culture, and the use of
technology, that could move state government toward
greatness.
One
potential outcome of the MAP Commission’s
recommendations is some restructuring of state
government. In Richard Young’s piece he examines a
number of issues related to implementing any such
restructuring. As he notes, implementing restructuring
can be extraordinarily complex and, in many cases, is
poorly executed. Factors such as lack of planning,
inadequate resources, and organizational resistance can
limit the effectiveness of any attempt at restructuring.
He explores several strategies that should be considered
in implementing any restructuring efforts successfully.
In
the article, “Public Attitudes Toward Planning and
Development in Rock Hill,” Scott Huffmon and B.J.
Thomas examine how the citizens of Rock Hill feel about
development in their city. After describing the history
of some recent development efforts, the authors
investigate public support for various development
approaches, such as converting vacant textile mills,
developing a light rail or trolley system, and improving
neighborhoods near downtown. This article highlights the
types of decisions and challenges that confront areas
across the state as they consider development issues.
Christine
Steagall’s article, “Addressing Regional Priorities
Through the DOD Region 4 Pollution Prevention
Partnership,” provides a brief description of a
project that has been undertaken to increase pollution
prevention at military installations in the region. This
project represents a joint effort among the Department
of Defense, the Environmental Protection Agency, state
agencies, military installations and universities in the
region aimed at enhancing base-level environmental
compliance and performance through pollution prevention.
Comments
and suggestions about the journal can be sent to young-richard@sc.edu.
|